Apple has suffered a setback in its ongoing antitrust case against Google. A US judge has rejected the company's request to stay the proceedings. This means that Apple has little influence over a possible decision that could mean the end of its lucrative search engine deal with Google. The remedy case against Google could result in Apple losing its annual $20 billion contract that secures Google as the default search engine on the iPhone. But why was Apple's request rejected and what happens now?
For years, Apple has earned billions through an agreement with Google that secures the search engine giant's exclusive default position on iPhones. While Apple emphasizes that users are free to choose their search engine, Google has a huge advantage in the market thanks to this default setting. The US Department of Justice officially classified Google as a monopolist in August 2024. Since then, lawsuits have been underway to determine how Google must change its market position. The agreement with Apple is also under discussion. Apple wanted to actively participate in the process to protect its own interests, but was thwarted by Judge Amit Mehta (via MLex).
Apple's application is rejected
Background of the trial against Google
The proceedings against Google began in 2020 and ended in August 2024 with the finding that Google has a monopoly-like position in the field of search and advertising. Now the so-called remedy procedure follows, in which it will be decided what measures Google must take to restore competition. One of the possible consequences is the termination of the search engine agreement between Google and Apple. If that happens, Apple would either have to find a new solution for the standard search on the iPhone or choose a completely new search engine partner.
Why did Apple want to get involved?
Apple is directly affected by this case. The company earns around $20 billion annually through its agreement with Google. If this deal is overturned, it would have a direct impact on Apple's revenue and possibly also on the user experience on iPhones. Apple argued that as an affected party, it should have a say in the case. The company therefore requested formal participation and a temporary stay of the case in order to better represent its interests. But Judge Mehta saw it differently.
The rejection by Judge Mehta
The judge rejected Apple's request for an emergency stay within just 24 hours. In his reasoning, he cited several reasons:
- Apple did not meet the “strict requirements” for such a suspension.
- The company failed to demonstrate that the remedies proposed by Google would cause it “irreparable harm.”
- Apple has not provided sufficient evidence that its proposals differ significantly from the measures already discussed.
- According to the judge, the public interest and the potential damage to other parties involved also spoke against a suspension.
Another point of criticism was that Apple reacted too late to the proceedings. While the trial against Google had already been ongoing since 2020, Apple only formally applied to participate in December 2024. The judge argued that Apple should have known from the start that these proceedings would also affect its business interests.
Despite setback: Apple fights for its right to have a say
Apple is obviously not happy with this decision. The company had already announced that it would look for alternative ways to influence the case. While it was trying to get Judge Mehta to stay the case, Apple simultaneously filed a similar motion with the DC Circuit, a higher court. The idea was that if Judge Mehta agreed to the stay, Apple would withdraw the motion with the DC Circuit. Since that did not happen, this separate motion remains. However, it is unclear when exactly the DC Circuit will decide the case or whether Apple will have a better chance there.
Google's monopoly is crumbling - and Apple is facing a dilemma
There is a lot at stake for Apple. If the remedy process does indeed lead to the end of the deal with Google, the company would have to look for new solutions. A partnership with other search providers or even the development of its own search engine would be possible. Judge Mehta has signaled that the remedy process should be pushed forward as quickly as possible. His goal is to complete the decision by August 2025 at the latest. This means that Apple has little time left to legally defend its interests. Whether the company takes further steps or comes to terms with the coming changes remains to be seen. What is certain, however, is that this process could have long-term effects on Apple's business model. (Photo by nuoil830 / Bigstockphoto)
- Apple defends the search engine deal with Google
- Apple Music presents Kendrick Lamar at Super Bowl LIX
- OpenAI launches o3-mini – a powerful AI model
- Apple Music Replay 2025 is here – Your music in retrospect
