{"id":59392,"date":"2025-10-08T15:49:31","date_gmt":"2025-10-08T13:49:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.apfelpatient.de\/?p=59392"},"modified":"2025-10-08T15:55:04","modified_gmt":"2025-10-08T13:55:04","slug":"apple-close-to-agreement-with-the-eu-on-digital-markets-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.apfelpatient.de\/en\/news\/apple-kurz-vor-einigung-mit-der-eu-ueber-digital-markets-act","title":{"rendered":"Apple close to agreement with the EU on Digital Markets Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Apple is close to reaching an agreement with the European Union. The background to this is the dispute over the Digital Markets Act (DMA). After months of public wrangling between the company and EU authorities, a solution now appears to be emerging behind the scenes.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The conflict between Apple and the EU Commission has dominated the technology industry in recent months. While Apple repeatedly openly criticized the European law and even called for a complete overhaul, the EU stuck to its guns. Officially, their positions are far apart, but according to a report in the Financial Times, both sides are now in the final stages of confidential negotiations. The goal is to clarify the remaining points of contention and find a lasting solution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A look back at Apple and the Digital Markets Act<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The Digital Markets Act was introduced to limit the market power of large technology companies. Companies with particularly strong market positions are considered "gatekeepers" under this law. They must ensure that they do not hinder competition. Apple was classified as a gatekeeper because the company, with its App Store and the iPhone ecosystem, has significant reach and market control. A central aspect of the DMA is the requirement to allow alternative app stores on the iPhone. This meant that Apple had to abandon the previous rule that apps could only be installed via its own App Store.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Apple between regulation and data protection<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

There are now several alternative app stores that are permitted to offer iPhone apps. The DMA also stipulates that Apple must make features offered in combination with its own hardware, such as AirPods or Apple Watch, available to third parties. Apple argues that this regulation poses data protection risks. For this reason, certain new iPhone features have been held back in the EU for the time being to avoid potential data protection issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A public war of words<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

A public dispute developed between Apple and the EU, which has become increasingly heated in recent months. Apple accused the EU of promoting unfair competition with the DMA. The company criticized the rules for being specifically aimed at Apple, while other manufacturers such as Samsung and large Chinese smartphone companies remained unchallenged. Apple emphasized that its own closed system enables an innovative and secure user experience that has often been copied by other companies \u2013 to the benefit of all users. The EU Commission reacted with sharp criticism, accusing<\/a> Apple of challenging every single provision of the DMA, thereby creating the impression that the company does not truly want to cooperate. The Commission stated that the DMA is not intended to reduce profits, but to ensure fair competition in the digital economy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Negotiations behind the scenes<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Despite the public tensions, talks continued in the background. According to a report<\/a> in the Financial Times, Apple and the EU are close to an agreement. Meta is also part of the ongoing negotiations. The companies are said to be in the final stages of talks with European regulators to reach an agreement that stipulates changes to certain business practices. The trigger was a fine totaling around \u20ac700 million imposed in April for alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. Apple has since fulfilled the requirement to allow third-party app stores. However, one central point of contention remains: the so-called Core Technology Fee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Apple defends controversial developer fee<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Apple imposes this fee on developers who distribute their apps outside of its own App Store. Critics see this as an indirect hindrance to competition, while Apple emphasizes that this fee is necessary to maintain iOS's security infrastructure. Insiders report that no final decision has been made yet, but that discussions are well advanced. Those involved are confident that the cases could be concluded soon\u2014although "soon" is certainly a relative term in European proceedings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n