{"id":57258,"date":"2025-08-07T02:52:33","date_gmt":"2025-08-07T00:52:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.apfelpatient.de\/?p=57258"},"modified":"2025-08-07T02:52:35","modified_gmt":"2025-08-07T00:52:35","slug":"iphone-apple-secures-trumps-favor-without-changing-production","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.apfelpatient.de\/en\/news\/iphone-apple-sichert-sich-trumps-gunst-ohne-produktionswechsel","title":{"rendered":"iPhone: Apple secures Trump's favor without changing production"},"content":{"rendered":"

For years, Apple has been the focus of political debates surrounding domestic production. The demand to manufacture the iPhone in the US has been a recurring topic \u2013 not least during the presidency of Donald Trump. Despite big promises and public announcements, the reality remains largely unchanged: Apple produces the iPhone almost entirely abroad. While the company invests billions in the US market, iPhone assembly remains outside the scope of the company's operations. This development raises questions \u2013 especially as to why even Trump is no longer calling for a complete relocation.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Apple recently announced<\/a> a further $100 billion investment in the United States. This sum will be invested in projects such as the expansion of data centers, infrastructure, suppliers, and local component manufacturing. Despite the high investment, one thing remains unchanged: The iPhone will still not be assembled in the USA. Furthermore, around 95 percent of the components used come from abroad. The key question remains: Why is an iPhone "Made in America" still nowhere in sight?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Investments instead of relocation<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

While Apple's new investments<\/a> are a clear signal to the US government, they do not affect the final assembly of the iPhone. This continues to take place primarily in Asia, for example at Foxconn in China. The majority of individual parts are also produced there or in other Asian countries. Only a small portion of the components are manufactured in the US. The new round of investments has not changed the actual production chain. The decision appears to be strategically motivated. With the promise of new jobs, US components, and long-term investments, Apple is creating political optimism without jeopardizing its own global supply chain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump's reaction: calmness instead of pressure<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

During the official announcement of the investments, a scene occurred that aptly sums up the relationship between Apple and the Trump administration. During a press conference, Apple CEO Tim Cook was asked whether the final assembly of the iPhone would also take place in the USA in the future. Before Cook could answer, Trump intervened and qualified the question himself. He explained that Apple already produces many components in the USA and that international manufacturing has a historical tradition. At the same time, he emphasized that Apple could be encouraged to relocate in the long term with incentives \u2013 but made it clear that the measures taken so far were sufficient for him. The statement, "Apple is coming back to America," thus remains more symbolic than real.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Apple's tactics: political points without structural break<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The relationship between Apple and the Trump administration is characterized by mutual calculation. Apple gives politicians what they want in the short term: jobs, investments, and prestige. In return, the company can maintain its global manufacturing model without facing additional tariffs or restrictions. One example of this is the proximity of the investment announcement to the introduction of<\/a> new tariffs on imported semiconductors. According to Trump, companies already investing in the US should be exempt from the 100 percent tariffs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n