{"id":52812,"date":"2025-03-18T14:15:34","date_gmt":"2025-03-18T13:15:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.apfelpatient.de\/?p=52812"},"modified":"2025-03-18T14:16:10","modified_gmt":"2025-03-18T13:16:10","slug":"apple-loses-appeal-against-federal-cartel-office-what-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.apfelpatient.de\/en\/news\/apple-verliert-berufung-gegen-bundeskartellamt-was-nun","title":{"rendered":"Apple loses appeal against Federal Cartel Office \u2013 What now?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Apple has lost a major antitrust case in Germany. The Federal Court of Justice has confirmed that the Federal Cartel Office has the right to regulate Apple's market power and set new rules for the App Store. This decision could have major implications for how Apple treats developers, third-party app stores, and its iPhone ecosystem in Germany.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Apple's control of the App Store has been a hotbed of controversy for years. While the company argues that it merely provides a platform for developers, regulators view this as a dominant market position with potentially anti-competitive behavior. The European Union has already introduced rules forcing Apple to allow alternative app stores. Now, Germany also has the legal means to take further action against Apple.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Apple loses appeal against the Federal Cartel Office<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The Federal Cartel Office had already classified Apple as a "company of paramount cross-market importance for competition" in 2023. This gives the authority special powers to regulate Apple's market behavior more strictly. Apple appealed this classification, arguing that it does not have a dominant market position in the mobile app sector as a whole. The Federal Court of Justice has now ruled in favor of the cartel authority. This paves the way for new regulations that may force Apple to further open the App Store or change certain business practices (via Reuters<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Differences between European and US competition law<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

A key factor that made this decision possible lies in the different approaches to competition law between Europe and the US. In the US, regulators must prove not only that a company is hindering competition, but also that this actually harms consumers. An example would be if customers demonstrably have to pay higher prices. In Europe, however, it is sufficient if a behavior potentially harms competition. This means that authorities can intervene preventively before concrete disadvantages arise for consumers. This is exactly what the Federal Cartel Office did in this case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What new rules are threatening Apple?<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

With this ruling, the Federal Cartel Office now has the opportunity to impose strict requirements on Apple. These could affect various aspects of the App Store:<\/p>\n\n\n\n