{"id":46322,"date":"2024-08-19T15:37:37","date_gmt":"2024-08-19T13:37:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.apfelpatient.de\/?p=46322"},"modified":"2024-08-19T15:37:40","modified_gmt":"2024-08-19T13:37:40","slug":"an-apple-search-engine-is-unlikely-to-come","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.apfelpatient.de\/en\/rumors\/kommt-eine-apple-suchmaschine-wahrscheinlich-eher-nicht","title":{"rendered":"Is an Apple search engine coming? Probably not"},"content":{"rendered":"

You've probably heard about the court decision that prohibits Google from paying Apple $20 billion a year to remain the default search engine on iPhones and other Apple devices. This decision has fueled speculation about whether Apple will develop its own search engine. But is that really likely?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Apple and Google are two giants that have been competing and cooperating with each other in various areas of technology for years. The lucrative deal that established Google as the default search engine on Apple devices was extremely profitable for both companies. But with the court decision<\/a>, which classifies this practice as anti-competitive, Apple is faced with a difficult decision: Should the company develop its own search engine to compensate for the lost revenue? Or is it wiser to focus on other business areas?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The end of the Google deal<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

When you start a web search on your iPhone by typing a query into the Safari bar, you will automatically be redirected to Google - unless you have manually changed this. This convenience for you as a user brought Google an immense number of searches and Apple an annual payment of around 20 billion dollars. But this win-win situation for the two tech giants has now been legally classified as anti-competitive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Speculations about an Apple search engine<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

With the end of this deal, there is much speculation about how Apple might make up for the lost revenue. One idea that keeps coming up is developing its own Apple search engine. After all, Apple already has experience indexing the Internet with Applebot, which is used for Siri and Apple Intelligence. Some believe that Apple would even be able to develop a better search engine than Google, given the company's enormous resources and impressive database. But it's not that simple. A search engine is more than just an index of the Internet; it's a complex system that relies on a huge amount of user data to deliver the best search results. And that's where the problem lies: Google has collected enormous amounts of data over many years, allowing it to continuously improve search results and display the best ads.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why an Apple search engine is unlikely<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Building a successful search engine would not only be extremely costly for Apple, but also risky. Unlike Google, which relies heavily on the use of user data for personalized advertising, Apple pursues a data protection strategy that is exactly the opposite. Having its own search engine would force Apple to either relax its data protection promises or forego significant revenue. In addition, it is questionable whether search engines in their current form have any long-term future at all. With the increasing popularity of chatbots and other innovative technologies, traditional search engines could soon become obsolete. Investing billions in the development of a technology that may soon be outdated does not seem particularly smart.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sales are not decisive<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Even if Apple wants to replace the $20 billion it lost in the Google deal, that's not a compelling reason to develop its own search engine. Apple earned $85 billion last year from its services alone. Even without Google's revenue, Apple remains extremely profitable, and growth in its other service divisions is expected to quickly make up for lost revenue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Risks outweigh the risks: Why Apple probably won't develop a search engine<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Although the idea of an Apple search engine seems tempting at first glance, the risks and challenges far outweigh the potential benefits. Apple would be well advised to continue to focus on its core competencies and the growth of its existing services rather than investing billions in developing its own search engine. Given the uncertain future of classic search engines and the high costs that would be associated with such a project, it seems unlikely that Apple will dare to take this step. It will be interesting to see how Apple will react to the loss of the Google deal - but its own search engine is unlikely to be the solution. Are you looking for new accessories? Then take a look\u00a0in our Amazon Storefront<\/a>\u00a0- there you will find numerous products from leading providers, also for HomeKit and Co.! (Image: Apple)<\/p>\n\n\n\n