{"id":32415,"date":"2022-06-14T15:47:16","date_gmt":"2022-06-14T13:47:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.apfelpatient.de\/?p=32415"},"modified":"2025-04-09T09:24:34","modified_gmt":"2025-04-09T07:24:34","slug":"apples-att-feature-federal-cartel-office-initiates-investigation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.apfelpatient.de\/en\/news\/apples-att-feature-bundeskartellamt-leitet-untersuchung-ein","title":{"rendered":"Apple's ATT feature: Federal Cartel Office launches investigation"},"content":{"rendered":"

The German Federal Cartel Office has initiated proceedings against Apple to investigate whether its tracking rules and anti-tracking technology are anti-competitive and self-serving, according to a press release.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the proceedings announced today, Apple's tracking rules, and in particular the App Tracking Transparency Framework (ATT), will be reviewed under competition law to determine whether they favor Apple itself or represent a hindrance to third-party apps. Andreas Mundt, President of the Federal Cartel Office, commented:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We welcome business models that handle data carefully and give users the choice of how their data is used. A company like Apple, which is able to unilaterally set rules for its ecosystem, especially for its App Store, should set rules that promote competition. We have reason to doubt that this is the case when we see that Apple's rules apply to third parties but not to Apple itself. This would allow Apple to favor its own offerings or hinder other companies. Our approach is largely based on the new powers we received under the stricter abuse control rules for large digital companies introduced last year (Section 19a of the Competition Act - GWB). On this basis, we are conducting or have already concluded proceedings against Google\/Alphabet, Meta\/Facebook and Amazon.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Apple's App Tracking Transparency Framework, introduced in April 2021 with the release of iOS 14.5 and iPadOS 14.5, requires all apps on iPhone and iPad to obtain the user's consent before tracking their activity in other apps. Apps that want to track a user based on their device's unique advertising identifier can only do so if the user allows it when asked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Apple's ATT feature: Not the first investigation<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Apple said the feature is designed to protect users, not to benefit the company. However, the preliminary findings from the Federal Cartel Office show that while users can prohibit Apple from using their data for personalized advertising, Apple "is not subject to the new and additional rules of the App Tracking Transparency Framework." The German competition authority's proceedings follow an earlier one launched against Apple in June 2021 to investigate allegations of anti-competitive behavior related to the App Store, its products, and other services. Many advertisers are affected by ATT, with Facebook being the loudest and most critical of the new change. Since Apple began beta testing the framework, Facebook has accused Apple of hurting small businesses that rely on advertising to keep their doors open.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Study proves opposite<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Facebook also claimed that the framework is anti-competitive because it gives Apple the upper hand to run its own mobile advertising business on iOS devices. An October 2021 Financial Times report claimed that ATT has resulted in a "windfall" for Apple's advertising business since its launch. The report claimed that Apple's share of the mobile app advertising market tripled in the six months after the feature was introduced. Apple has refuted claims that its ATT system gives the company an unfair advantage to the detriment of third parties. Earlier this year, Apple commissioned a study on the impact of ATT, conducted by Columbia Business School's marketing department. The study concluded that it is unlikely that Apple has gained any significant financial advantage since the privacy feature was introduced and that claims to the contrary are speculative and lack evidence. (Photo by Unsplash \/ David Grandmougin)<\/p>\n\n\n\n